<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Engineering on Ligiu Uiorean</title><link>https://uiorean.com/tags/engineering/</link><description>Recent content in Engineering on Ligiu Uiorean</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en_US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 05:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://uiorean.com/tags/engineering/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Scrutiny and made-up numbers</title><link>https://uiorean.com/posts/2012-10-11-scrutiny-and-made-up-numbers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 05:41:55 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://uiorean.com/posts/2012-10-11-scrutiny-and-made-up-numbers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As an engineer, I am always amazed that proposed solutions that rely on years of experience, research, testing, sleepless nights and stacks of documentation and numbers are sctutinized beyond belief, opposed with the most inane arguments and quickly forgotten but on the other hand, made up statistics, pie-in-the-sky numbers or weak conjectures are accepted by everybody, hang around for years unchallenged and end up in business cases and news.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on Facebook.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>